A reader may be in” a text as a character is in a novel, but also as one is in a train of thought–both Interaction between Text and Reader; Wolfgang Iser; pp. Wolfgang Iser (22 July – 24 January ) was a German literary scholar. A literary work, which for Iser is created when a reader and a text “converge, consists of two “poles”: This does not mean that the “real” reader simply accepts this role, but rather they exist in tension between their own historical . Interaction. A reader may be in” a text as a character is in a novel, but also as one is in a train of thought–both possessing and being Wolfgang Iser. Central to the reading of every literary work is the interaction between its structure and its recipient.
|Published (Last):||4 March 2005|
|PDF File Size:||5.58 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This is how the interaction continues between a text and a reader through concealment and revelation. In the New Critical approach, qualities such as harmony are considered valuable in their own right.
The elements of space also are significant role in the interaction. Following Poulet, Iser insists that in reading, it is the reader, not the author, who becomes the subject that does the thinking.
Here he explains the actual process of interaction text and reader. As readers, we occupy a perspective that is continually moving and changing according to the way we make sense of the accumulating fictional material. Here he follows Hans Blumenbergand attempts to apply his theory of modernity to Shakespeare. It bears noting that this kind of literalization does not necessarily work against the grain of Iser’s theory of reading.
However, these gaps cannot be filled betwee, but through interpretive limits given in the text by an author. He makes it clear that the interaction between text and reader does not resemble exactly the interaction between person and person.
For Iser, meaning is not an object to be found within a text, but is an event of construction that occurs somewhere between the text and the reader. While Iser suggests that a reader and a text enter into a kind of conversation, WORP makes possible the extension of this dialogue to include other readers. He explains the complex nature of interaction between text and reader by giving the example of interpersonal relation and interaction between two individuals. Do Readers Make Meaning?
Interaction between Text and Reader Wolfgang Iser pp. Built on the Johns Hopkins University Campus. Notes on Contributors pp.
Two factors govern this process of recreation: The text must be able to bring about a standpoint or perspective from which the reader will be able to do this. These reactions are in part determined by the repertoire and structure of the text which provide some insight into the role of the author of the text in Iser’s scheme.
These paperback editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback editions. The conversation between Lindsey and “The Unsex’d Females” is made manifest by her glossing of a phrase.
But how does this happen? The meaning of the text is generated by the convergence of these perspectives, a convergence that is not itself set out in words but occurs during the reading process.
Key Theories of Wolfgang Iser | Literary Theory and Criticism
It is cybernetic in nature as it involves a feedback of effects and information throughout a sequence of changing situational frames; smaller units progressively merge into bigger ones, so that meaning gathers meaning in a kind of snowballing process. Future bettween of “The Unsex’d Females” will have the option of reading Lindsey’s comment alongside the original poem.
The goal of the Princeton Betweem Library is to vastly increase access tect the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in Every fictional structure, according to Iser, is two-sided: Wolfgang Iser, The Implied Reader: Hereafter cited as IR.
This subjective element, however, cannot overdetermine the interaction that takes place and Iser is careful to frequently warn against assuming that interpretations and texts “[disappear] into the private world of [their] individual readers.
This standpoint is multifaceted, because the narrator, the characters, the plot, and the fictitious reader all offer sides of it.
It hasn’t necessarily fundamentally altered that process, only enhanced the ways of articulating it. This page was last edited on 31 Octoberat The poem remains intact, since Lindsey’s comment is placed outside of the poem’s frame.
INTERACTION BETWEEN TEXT AND THE READER
Reading as Construction Twetan Todorav pp. In the right-hand frame shown in the figure, an annotation to the phrase “unsex’d woman” appears. His critique of the psychological models of reading is centered on his objection that they do not adequately user our reading of literature as an aesthetic experience: Title Page, Copyright pp.
They activate the reader for the process of ideation. Toward a Sociology of Reading Jacques Leenhardt pp.
But the proof for Iser’s claim that the reader “inserts his own ideas into the process of communication” is based upon Iser’s insertion of “his own ideas” into the interpretation of literary texts, making his claims somewhat circular.
Intrection between text and the reader. A The interaction between person and person is generally face to face which is not possible in case of an interaction between text and reader because as such one is animate while the beween is inanimate and yet interaction takes place. And this act of aesthetic recreation, says Iser, is not a smooth or linear process and it actually relies on continual interruption of the flow of reading: The potential for interaction to become participatory in this more communal way represents the possibility of moving interpretation beyond “the private world” to create a sense of meaning which is more concretely intersubjective.